| 
				 
				
				Pl 
				 Poe 
				
				
				Df 
				 Ullman 
				
				
				Party Description 
				
				o        
				
				 Patients and doctors challenge the 
				constitutionality under the Fourteenth amendment over a 
				Connecticut statute that prohibits the use of contraceptive 
				devices and giving of medical advice in the use of such devices. 
				
				
				State Supreme Court 
				
				o        
				
				The State Supreme court held that 
				the statutes were applicable to married couples even under claim 
				that conception would constitute a serious threat to the help or 
				life of the female spouse. 
				
				
				Husband and Wife Complaint 
				
				o        
				
				Paul and Pauline Poe. 
				
				o        
				
				Mrs. Poe had three consecutive 
				pregnancies in which the infants died due to genetic 
				abnormalities. 
				
				o        
				
				Their doctor, Dr. Buxton, said or in 
				order to prevent further psychological strain the best and 
				safest medical treatment could be prescribed is advice in 
				methods or preventing conception,. 
				
				o        
				
				The Poes have been unable to obtain 
				this information for the sole reason that its delivery and use 
				may or will be claimed by the defendant States Attorney to 
				constitute offense against Connecticut law. 
				
				
				Jane Doe 
				
				o        
				
				25 year old house wife that suffered 
				partial paralysis, speech impairment, and emotional instability. 
				
				o        
				
				Dr. Buxton also believes that the 
				best and safest treatment is contraception. 
				
				
				US Supreme Court 
				
				o        
				
				  
				
				
				  
				
				
				   | 
				
				 
				
				Dr. Buxton seek declaratory judgment [Justice Frankfurter, Chief 
				Justice, Justice Clark, and Justice Whittaker] 
				
				o        
				
				He asks that the Connecticut 
				statutes be adjudged unconstitutional, as depriving him of 
				liberty and property without due process. 
				
				
				  
				
				
				Supreme Court 
				
				o        
				
				The appellate seeks to justify the 
				exercise of our declaratory power by the treath of prosecution. 
				
				
				  
				
				
				Rule 
				
				o        
				
				The mere existence of a state penal 
				statute would constitute insufficient grounds to support a 
				federal court's adjudication of its constitutionality in 
				proceedings brought against the State's prosecuting officials 
				if real threat of enforcement 
				is wanting 
				
				  
				
				
				Court 
				 Statutes is not Being Enforced 
				
				o        
				
				The fact that Connecticut has 
				not chosen to press the 
				enforcement of this statute deprives these 
				controversies of the immediacy which is an indispensable 
				condition of constitutional adjudication.  
				
				
				  
				
				
				Cannot umpire harmless debates 
				
				o        
				
				This Court cannot be 
				umpire to debates concerning 
				harmless, empty shadows. 
				
				o        
				
				 To find it necessary to pass on 
				these statutes now, in order to protect appellants from the 
				hazards of prosecution, would be to close our eyes to reality.. 
				
				
				  
				
				
				DISSENT [Justice Douglas] 
				
				o        
				
				We should not term them away and 
				make flout the law and get arrested to have their constitutional 
				rights determined. 
				
				o        
				
				They are entitled to an answer to 
				their predicament.   |